Skip to content

Handle semi-auto properties with expression bodies #1026

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024
Merged

Handle semi-auto properties with expression bodies #1026

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

Sergio0694
Copy link
Member

Follow up to #1020

Fixes a small false positive found by @Youssef1313 😄

PR Checklist

  • Created a feature/dev branch in your fork (vs. submitting directly from a commit on main)
  • Based off latest main branch of toolkit
  • PR doesn't include merge commits (always rebase on top of our main, if needed)
  • Tested code with current supported SDKs
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features) (if applicable)
  • Header has been added to all new source files (run build/UpdateHeaders.bat)
  • Contains NO breaking changes
  • Every new API (including internal ones) has full XML docs
  • Code follows all style conventions

@Sergio0694 Sergio0694 added mvvm-toolkit 🧰 Issues/PRs for the MVVM Toolkit bugfix 🔧 PRs fixing a discovered bug analyzer 👓 A new analyzer being implemented or updated labels Dec 12, 2024
@Sergio0694 Sergio0694 merged commit 657c697 into main Dec 12, 2024
3 checks passed
@Sergio0694 Sergio0694 deleted the dev/fix-body-expressions branch December 12, 2024 07:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Youssef1313 Youssef1313 Youssef1313 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
analyzer 👓 A new analyzer being implemented or updated bugfix 🔧 PRs fixing a discovered bug mvvm-toolkit 🧰 Issues/PRs for the MVVM Toolkit
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Sergio0694 @Youssef1313