Skip to content

[SYCL] Improve Doxygen documentation UX #1201

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

alexbatashev
Copy link
Contributor

  • Fix classes missing due to inline namespace macro.
  • Enable first sentence as brief.
  • Make diagrams clickable.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Batashev alexander.batashev@intel.com

- Fix classes missing due to inline namespace macro.
- Enable first sentence as brief.
- Make diagrams clickable.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Batashev <alexander.batashev@intel.com>

# If the QT_AUTOBRIEF tag is set to YES then doxygen will interpret the first
# line (until the first dot) of a Qt-style comment as the brief description. If
# set to NO, the Qt-style will behave just like regular Qt-style comments (thus
# requiring an explicit \brief command for a brief description.)
# The default value is: NO.

QT_AUTOBRIEF = NO
QT_AUTOBRIEF = YES
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need both QT_AUTOBRIEF and JAVADOC_AUTOBRIEF? I suggest to stick with one style of doxygen comments and therefore, don't encourage usage of others by disabling different helper features for them

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AlexeySachkov is it ok if I prepare a separate pull request that makes the whole documentation up to LLVM standards and disables all Java-style features for good?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@alexbatashev, works for me

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AlexeySachkov, please, "resolve" conversations to let me know that PRs are ready for merge.

@bader bader requested a review from AlexeySachkov February 27, 2020 09:33
@bader bader merged commit 52e1c06 into intel:sycl Feb 27, 2020
@alexbatashev alexbatashev deleted the private/abatashe/improve_doxygen_config branch September 17, 2021 06:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants