-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[Flang OpenMP] Add semantics checks for cray pointer usage in DSA list #121028
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Thirumalai-Shaktivel
merged 1 commit into
llvm:main
from
Thirumalai-Shaktivel:llvm/cray_ptr_01
Jan 16, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ | ||
!RUN: %python %S/../test_errors.py %s %flang -fopenmp | ||
subroutine test_cray_pointer_usage | ||
implicit none | ||
real(8) :: var(*), pointee(2) | ||
pointer(ivar, var) | ||
|
||
pointee = 42.0 | ||
ivar = loc(pointee) | ||
|
||
!$omp parallel num_threads(2) default(none) | ||
! ERROR: The DEFAULT(NONE) clause requires that the Cray Pointer 'ivar' must be listed in a data-sharing attribute clause | ||
print *, var(1) | ||
!$omp end parallel | ||
|
||
! ERROR: Cray Pointee 'var' may not appear in PRIVATE clause, use Cray Pointer 'ivar' instead | ||
!$omp parallel num_threads(2) default(none) private(var) | ||
print *, var(1) | ||
!$omp end parallel | ||
|
||
!$omp parallel num_threads(2) default(none) firstprivate(ivar) | ||
print *, var(1) | ||
!$omp end parallel | ||
|
||
!$omp parallel num_threads(2) default(private) shared(ivar) | ||
print *, var(1) | ||
!$omp end parallel | ||
end subroutine test_cray_pointer_usage |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mjklemm is this a correct interpretation of the standard? It isn't clear to me if naming cray pointees is actually prohibited, it only seems to require that the data-sharing attribute is the same as the pointer.
Of course, they are deprecated so we could disallow on those grounds (as we did with
-
reductions).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The OpenMP specification is ambiguous on this. Let's do it this way and see if application users will complain about this. :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is the same as the target of the pointer.