-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.2k
gh-85294: Handle missing arguments to @singledispatchmethod gracefully #21471
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
serhiy-storchaka
merged 7 commits into
python:main
from
ammaraskar:singledispatchmethod
Feb 16, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
46dbf3c
bpo-41122: Handle missing arguments to @singledispatchmethod gracefully
ammaraskar de12588
Fix test name
ammaraskar 737a8d2
Merge branch 'main' into singledispatchmethod
serhiy-storchaka 171f0a5
Remove _funcname attribute.
serhiy-storchaka 1d48a93
Polishing.
serhiy-storchaka f41eafb
Update Lib/functools.py
serhiy-storchaka 0f0466e
Revert "Update Lib/functools.py"
serhiy-storchaka File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions
3
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2020-07-13-23-59-42.bpo-41122.8P_Brh.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||
Failing to pass arguments properly to :func:`functools.singledispatchmethod` | ||
now throws a TypeError instead of hitting an index out of bounds | ||
internally. |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't done benchmarks, but is there a risk that this could add unnecessary overhead to the happy path? What if we did something like this @serhiy-storchaka?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks reasonable, but could you please benchmark this? Your code is not zero cost either, it adds STORE_FAST+LOAD_FAST instead of LOAD_FAST+TO_BOOL+POP_JUMP_IF_TRUE.
If there is a difference, we perhaps should apply the same optimization in
singledispatch()
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I'll benchmark it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For now, I reverted this change because it complicates the code. And the solution for other issues may change it anyway. It is better to defer it until the code will be stabilized.