-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.4k
GH-93964: Harden overflow checks before _PyBytes_Resize in compile.c #94044
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sweeneyde
wants to merge
8
commits into
python:main
Choose a base branch
from
sweeneyde:compile_overflows
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
72ab0f5
Harden overflow checks before _PyBytes_Resize in compile.c
sweeneyde fa9e69d
📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
blurb-it[bot] e0054bf
Another test, more comments
sweeneyde e05b51e
remove unused variable
sweeneyde cebc41b
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into compile_overflows
sweeneyde 75a08cd
simplify checks by using b_len/unitsize. use INT_MAX..
sweeneyde 7febdc8
re-use b_len
sweeneyde 4a708eb
remove misleading assertion
sweeneyde File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions
1
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core and Builtins/2022-06-21-02-52-39.gh-issue-93964.Cg1LE7.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Strengthened compiler overflow checks to prevent crashes when compiling very large source files. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This has the same issue as the backport.
We want to be able to index all code object structures with an
int
, so you'll needINT_MAX
instead ofPY_SSIZE_T_MAX
and it should be an overflow error, not a memory error.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To clarify, we want
a_bytecode
to be able to haveINT_MAX
code units, not justINT_MAX
bytes, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We probably want the smaller amount to avoid risk of overflow. So the length in bytes should be less than
INT_MAX
.