-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.5k
Add regression test for nested replacement ranges in cfg_eval #139286
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@rustbot label -S-waiting-on-review +S-waiting-on-author |
@rustbot ready |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is just me having a very first glance at this PR and at surrounding context, I'll give this a proper review some other time:
I'm surprised that this test leads to errors (2× "removing an expression is not supported in this position") in nightly-2024-08-15 which is a few nightlies before PR #128725 (which intro'ed the ICE reported in #129166 (e.g., nightly-2024-09-08)). Shouldn't it pass in that version to be a proper regression test instead of erroring as in nightly-2024-09-09?
Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use |
Closes #132727