Skip to content

[MRG] Example for JMLR #211

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 31, 2016
Merged

[MRG] Example for JMLR #211

merged 7 commits into from
Dec 31, 2016

Conversation

glemaitre
Copy link
Member

@glemaitre glemaitre commented Dec 26, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Reference Issue

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

  • Classification with a final classification report
  • Example presenting the different metrics used in imbalanced learn
  • Extra examples showing multi-class balancing whenever possible

Any other comments?

We need to merge #204 before

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 26, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 98.895% when pulling 4e61354 on glemaitre:examples_jmlr into 938cf53 on scikit-learn-contrib:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 26, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 98.895% when pulling 3b4a5d3 on glemaitre:examples_jmlr into 938cf53 on scikit-learn-contrib:master.

@glemaitre glemaitre changed the title [WIP] Example for JMLR [MRG] Example for JMLR Dec 26, 2016
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 26, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 98.895% when pulling 9a6bf18 on glemaitre:examples_jmlr into 938cf53 on scikit-learn-contrib:master.

@glemaitre glemaitre force-pushed the examples_jmlr branch 4 times, most recently from f59847d to ca8a325 Compare December 31, 2016 15:57
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 31, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.0009%) to 98.895% when pulling e3e41ec on glemaitre:examples_jmlr into ac16d91 on scikit-learn-contrib:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 31, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.0009%) to 98.895% when pulling e3e41ec on glemaitre:examples_jmlr into ac16d91 on scikit-learn-contrib:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 31, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.0009%) to 98.895% when pulling 515d165 on glemaitre:examples_jmlr into ac16d91 on scikit-learn-contrib:master.

@glemaitre glemaitre merged commit ca8e7f4 into scikit-learn-contrib:master Dec 31, 2016
christophe-rannou pushed a commit to christophe-rannou/imbalanced-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2017
@glemaitre
[MRG] Example for JMLR (scikit-learn-contrib#211)
4058a04 
* Add a classification report example

* add an example for multiclass

* finish the example

* Use signature instead of poping kwargs

* Solve the issue with the doc

* Correct mispealing

* Add readme for dataset examples
glemaitre added a commit to glemaitre/imbalanced-learn that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2017
@glemaitre
[MRG] Example for JMLR (scikit-learn-contrib#211)
c28c839 
* Add a classification report example

* add an example for multiclass

* finish the example

* Use signature instead of poping kwargs

* Solve the issue with the doc

* Correct mispealing

* Add readme for dataset examples
glemaitre added a commit to glemaitre/imbalanced-learn that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2017
@glemaitre
[MRG] Example for JMLR (scikit-learn-contrib#211)
7c75f4a 
* Add a classification report example

* add an example for multiclass

* finish the example

* Use signature instead of poping kwargs

* Solve the issue with the doc

* Correct mispealing

* Add readme for dataset examples
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@glemaitre @coveralls