Skip to content

test: ensure that we do not regress the standard library isolation #31870

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 19, 2020

Conversation

compnerd
Copy link
Member

Add a test to ensure that the standard library does not accidentally end
up with symbols in the llvm:: namespace. The LLVMSupport symbols for
now are namespaced to __swift::__runtime with the desire that they
will move into swift:: and become vended in the swift namespace.

Replace this paragraph with a description of your changes and rationale. Provide links to external references/discussions if appropriate.

Resolves SR-NNNN.

Add a test to ensure that the standard library does not accidentally end
up with symbols in the `llvm::` namespace.  The LLVMSupport symbols for
now are namespaced to `__swift::__runtime` with the desire that they
will move into `swift::` and become vended in the swift namespace.
@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test

@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

CC: @mikeash

Allow empty input as PE/COFF does not provide a symbol table which results in no visible symbols.
@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test

@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test Windows platform

1 similar comment
@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test Windows platform

@compnerd compnerd merged commit bfb65ec into swiftlang:master May 19, 2020
@compnerd compnerd deleted the stdlib-insurance branch May 19, 2020 17:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant