Skip to content

chore: update jest from v29 to v30 #253

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

ersachin3112
Copy link
Contributor

@ersachin3112 ersachin3112 commented Jun 16, 2025

This PR contains a:

  • bugfix
  • new feature
  • code refactor
  • test update
  • typo fix
  • metadata update

Motivation / Use-Case

update jest from v29 to v30

Breaking Changes

No

Additional Info

No

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.02%. Comparing base (149b17f) to head (c76ac2e).
Report is 17 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #253   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.02%   98.02%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         355      355           
  Branches      105      105           
=======================================
  Hits          348      348           
  Misses          6        6           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@alexander-akait alexander-akait merged commit 4797cc1 into webpack-contrib:master Jun 20, 2025
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants