Skip to content

attempt CI fix #2133

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 21, 2025
Merged

attempt CI fix #2133

merged 3 commits into from
May 21, 2025

Conversation

ymc9
Copy link
Member

@ymc9 ymc9 commented May 21, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 21, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The run function in packages/testtools/src/schema.ts was updated to include a fallback mechanism. If the original command execution fails, the function now attempts to rerun the command using execSync with inherited standard IO streams, logging the error and displaying output in real time before rethrowing the original error. No public interfaces were changed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
packages/testtools/src/schema.ts Modified the run function to add a fallback execution with execSync and stdio: 'inherit' in the catch block.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant run()
    participant execSync

    Caller->>run(): invoke run(command, options)
    run->>execSync: execSync(command, options)
    alt success
        execSync-->>run(): result
        run-->>Caller: return result
    else error
        run-->>run(): log error
        run->>execSync: execSync(command, { stdio: 'inherit', ...options })
        execSync-->>run(): (output displayed in real time)
        run-->>Caller: throw original error
    end
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2032219 and 2947a94.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/testtools/src/schema.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/testtools/src/schema.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: build-test (20.x)
  • GitHub Check: build-test (20.x)
  • GitHub Check: dependency-review
  • GitHub Check: build-test (20.x)
  • GitHub Check: OSSAR-Scan
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/testtools/src/schema.ts (1)

45-63: Good improvement for CI debugging visibility!

The added fallback execution with stdio: 'inherit' is a smart approach for CI environments. When the initial command fails, running it again with inherited IO streams will display the output in real-time in CI logs, making it much easier to diagnose failures.

Consider adding a brief comment explaining the rationale for this pattern to help future developers understand why the command is executed twice in failure scenarios:

 catch (err) {
     console.error('Command failed:', cmd, err);
+    // Re-run with inherited stdio to show output in real-time for CI debugging
     execSync(cmd, {
         stdio: 'inherit',
         encoding: 'utf-8',
         env: { ...process.env, DO_NOT_TRACK: '1', ...env },
         cwd,
     });
     throw err;
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1b44c2b and 79b36dd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/testtools/src/schema.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
packages/testtools/src/schema.ts (1)
packages/schema/src/utils/exec-utils.ts (1)
  • execSync (6-10)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: dependency-review
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: build-test (20.x)
  • GitHub Check: build-test (20.x)
  • GitHub Check: build-test (20.x)
  • GitHub Check: OSSAR-Scan

@ymc9 ymc9 merged commit c5435ea into dev May 21, 2025
11 checks passed
@ymc9 ymc9 deleted the chore/attemp-ci-fix branch May 21, 2025 04:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant