Skip to content

Binho Nova integration #43

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Dec 3, 2019
Merged

Binho Nova integration #43

merged 15 commits into from
Dec 3, 2019

Conversation

fig1010
Copy link
Contributor

@fig1010 fig1010 commented Dec 2, 2019

Adding BLINKA_NOVA support

@ladyada ladyada requested a review from makermelissa December 2, 2019 23:55
@ladyada
Copy link
Member

ladyada commented Dec 3, 2019

@fig1010
Copy link
Contributor Author

fig1010 commented Dec 3, 2019

please fix
https://travis-ci.com/adafruit/Adafruit_Python_PlatformDetect/builds/139063671#L538

Thanks, will monitor travis output from here on out and fix accordingly.

@ladyada
Copy link
Member

ladyada commented Dec 3, 2019

@makermelissa LGTM take a look too in case i missed something :)

@@ -68,6 +68,8 @@

MICROCHIP_MCP2221 = "MICROCHIP_MCP2221"

BINHO_NOVA = "NOVA"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My only concern on this PR is that there's another board named Nova that will be added in the future. Can we change the string from "NOVA" to "BINHO_NOVA"? Otherwise, everything else looks good to me too.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, sure. I can make this change to use "BINHO_NOVA" instead. Thanks for the heads up!

Copy link
Collaborator

@makermelissa makermelissa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@makermelissa makermelissa merged commit 93c4d5c into adafruit:master Dec 3, 2019
@makermelissa
Copy link
Collaborator

makermelissa commented Dec 3, 2019

Hi @fig1010, it looks like we have a slight problem here. Travis is failing because you have a circular dependency and as a result, PlatformDetect is not getting pushed to PyPI where it would be available to allow your other PR to pass its test. When I merged, I didn't realize it would push it only if it passed.

Could you submit another PR where PlatformDetect does not depend on Blinka?
Thanks.

@fig1010
Copy link
Contributor Author

fig1010 commented Dec 3, 2019

Hi @fig1010, it looks like we have a slight problem here. Travis is failing because you have a circular dependency and as a result, PlatformDetect is not getting pushed to PyPI where it would be available to allow your other PR to pass its test. When I merged, I didn't realize it would push it only if it passed.

Could you submit another PR where PlatformDetect does not depend on Blinka?
Thanks.

We're looking into this now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants