Skip to content

Merge 2020-05-19 into tensorflow #31891

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 353 commits into from
May 27, 2020
Merged

Merge 2020-05-19 into tensorflow #31891

merged 353 commits into from
May 27, 2020

Conversation

asuhan
Copy link
Contributor

@asuhan asuhan commented May 19, 2020

No description provided.

CodaFi and others added 30 commits May 13, 2020 12:34
Now that the parser no longer constructs invalid TypeReprs for if-lets,
printing the annotation here will always reflect what the user actually
wrote.

rdar://62894516
Fixes <rdar://problem/63195315>
Const-Qualify LangOptions and TypeCheckerOptions
standard library: remove use of `LLVM.h` in the compatibility
runtime: namespace SmallVectorImpl for inline namespace
[overlay] Remove unnecessary Optional unwrapping
The runtime has an embedded copy of LLVMSupport which provides
`llvm::function_ref` as `__swift::__runtime::llvm::function_ref`.  This
forward declaration can cause the inlined namespaces to be ignored.
Remove the forward declaration for the runtime.
These line numbers are consumed by LLDB and stored in the Declaration object,
but as far as I can tell no user-facing feature relies on this.

Removing the line number can reduce the churn for incremental builds
significantly, since whitespace changes in one file may trigger a recompilation
of any file that uses a type declared below the whitespace change.

<rdar://problem/63156560>
in expression context analysis. They are simply not necessary.

rdar://problem/60982638
They both do essentially the same thing, with the
single-file request being the single-element case
of the whole-module request, with only the call to
`getAllForModule` really caring about the
difference.
Remove The Parser Hack For If-Let
runtime: remove forward declaration of `llvm::function_ref`
…hors

[TypeChecker/Doc] NFC: Locators now refer to a generic AST node inste…
…ing a toolchain"

This reverts commit a49e872.

This had the intended effect, but it also means we cannot run the tests on
the pakcage bots anymore, which is not desirable.
AssociatedTypeInference: Allow inference in compatible constrained extensions
@asuhan asuhan force-pushed the tensorflow-merge branch from 9a65ab0 to c609fc9 Compare May 19, 2020 21:30
@asuhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

asuhan commented May 19, 2020

@swift-ci Please clean test TensorFlow

@asuhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

asuhan commented May 19, 2020

@swift-ci Please clean test TensorFlow.

@asuhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

asuhan commented May 19, 2020

@swift-ci Please clean test TensorFlow

1 similar comment
@asuhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

asuhan commented May 19, 2020

@swift-ci Please clean test TensorFlow

@asuhan asuhan force-pushed the tensorflow-merge branch from 6f12c59 to 76e2592 Compare May 19, 2020 23:18
@asuhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

asuhan commented May 19, 2020

@swift-ci Please clean test TensorFlow

3 similar comments
@asuhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

asuhan commented May 19, 2020

@swift-ci Please clean test TensorFlow

@asuhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

asuhan commented May 20, 2020

@swift-ci Please clean test TensorFlow

@asuhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

asuhan commented May 20, 2020

@swift-ci Please clean test TensorFlow

@asuhan asuhan force-pushed the tensorflow-merge branch 3 times, most recently from 988e4a5 to c609fc9 Compare May 22, 2020 04:35
@asuhan asuhan force-pushed the tensorflow-merge branch from 428229b to 10b3972 Compare May 24, 2020 17:33
@asuhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

asuhan commented May 24, 2020

@swift-ci Please clean test TensorFlow

2 similar comments
@asuhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

asuhan commented May 24, 2020

@swift-ci Please clean test TensorFlow

@asuhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

asuhan commented May 24, 2020

@swift-ci Please clean test TensorFlow

@asuhan asuhan force-pushed the tensorflow-merge branch from 10b3972 to 7148362 Compare May 26, 2020 21:14
@asuhan asuhan requested a review from ematejska May 26, 2020 21:15
"swift-tools-support-core": "0.0.1",
"swiftpm": "swift-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2020-05-11-a",
"swiftpm": "swift-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2020-05-20-a",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ematejska NB: I needed to adjust the swiftpm dependency to pick up swiftlang/swift-package-manager@3f55ea6.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, got it.

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
"platforms": [ "Linux" ]
},
"yams": {
"remote": { "id": "jpsim/Yams" }
"remote": { "id": "asuhan/Yams" }
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ematejska Required until jpsim/Yams#260 (or a better version of it) is merged and released.

Copy link
Contributor

@ematejska ematejska May 26, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it. This seems like the right decision for now to me.

@asuhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

asuhan commented May 26, 2020

@ematejska PTAL, only two snags in utils/update_checkout/update-checkout-config.json, rest of the merge is pristine tensorflow-stage from our merge bot.

@asuhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

asuhan commented May 26, 2020

@swift-ci Please clean test TensorFlow

1 similar comment
@asuhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

asuhan commented May 26, 2020

@swift-ci Please clean test TensorFlow

Copy link
Contributor

@ematejska ematejska left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like the right tradeoff to me to use the forked yams for now.

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
"platforms": [ "Linux" ]
},
"yams": {
"remote": { "id": "jpsim/Yams" }
"remote": { "id": "asuhan/Yams" }
Copy link
Contributor

@ematejska ematejska May 26, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it. This seems like the right decision for now to me.

@asuhan asuhan merged commit e0e31e8 into tensorflow May 27, 2020
@asuhan asuhan deleted the tensorflow-merge branch May 27, 2020 05:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.